
Naive critics are accustomed to saying that life is random, things do not turn out, or present themselves, in life with the glittering appositeness and fated inevitability that they do in literature. Everyday experience contradicts this silly wisdom every day – The Biographer's Tale
My first encounter with A.S. Byatt was through a borrowed copy of Possession for which I am, to this day, grateful. It was not only because I was able to, god forbid, relate, being a Literature graduate and not unfamiliar with the tedious but fulfilling process of reading, analysis and research. It was because Possession had a great set of characters, an even better story, and a pleasing density of language that had me running for my own copy.
Enter The Biographer’s Tale.
Phineas G. Nanson is a postmodern literary theory graduate student, working on a dissertation called “Personae of female desire in the novels of Ronald Firbank, E.M. Forster and Somerset Maugham.” In the middle of a lecture on Lacan, he realizes that he cannot go on with what he is doing. He embarks himself on a mission to work with “concrete” things (to say “real” is debatable, especially in his acquired post-structuralist mindset) and his first step was to abandon his dissertation for the more “other-centric” discipline of the biography. Initially thinking the biography a “gossipy” form, Nanson promptly changes his mind after reading the work of biographer Scholes Destry-Scholes and, in fact, decides to write a biography of the biographer.
And so it begins. Like Possession, we are given a firsthand look into the process of research and in Nanson’s case, to start out with almost nothing. Given the fact that Scholes Destry-Scholes is no popular figure, Nanson has an exceptionally hard time piecing scraps of documents together to form a somewhat coherent whole. We are shown parts of an Ibsen biography, as well as those of Francis Galton and Carl Linnaeus. In this process, as almost all stories go, he is able to look into himself as well as Scholes Destry-Scholes by the end of it. In addition, fans of history and literary theory will have a ball with the smattering of the terminology and the names close to their hearts.
I’m going to be honest (hey we’re all honest folk here at Prose Portal) and admit that although I enjoyed it on the whole, reading this book was pretty slow-going. It is not, shall we say, as fluid an experience as it is reading Possession. I believe that one reason is that ¾ of the novel is comprised of the actual fragmented research material that Nanson is assembling. Of course, while these parts are essential and interesting at the most, they also resulted in “rushing” the story itself. Perhaps that is what Byatt aimed to do – to muffle both biographers and pay tribute only to the complexities of biography – and by that route she succeeds.
That book was a good, exciting read, and after reading more about his work on the Internet, I started pining for his other work. Norwegian Wood was the book that made Murakami a cultural sensation in Japan, and I finally got a copy last month from